Bioassay Method Transfer Strategies to Reduce Variability

Biotech, Drug Discovery & Development, Life Science, Pharma, Pharma Manufacturing & Supply Chain,
  • Wednesday, January 14, 2026 | 10am EST (NA) / 3pm GMT (UK) / 4pm CET (EU-Central)
  • 60 min

Bioassay variability can pose significant challenges due to laboratory conditions, instrumentation, analytical software, cell culture performance and reagent sourcing. These inconsistencies can impact assay reproducibility, data integrity and regulatory compliance, ultimately affecting product quality and potency assessments. This webinar will highlight phase-appropriate strategies that balance flexibility in early development with the rigour required for late-phase validation, ensuring method consistency.

Recent guidance from regulators emphasizes bioassays and potency assurance strategies, underscoring the robustness of these assays and their ability to be moved across multiple locations throughout product development.

The method transfer involves relocating a bioanalytical procedure from one laboratory environment, often a development or research lab, to another, such as a quality control lab, a contract research organization or back to the innovator’s lab. The FDA and EMA emphasize documentation, robust comparability studies and risk-based approaches to method validation. The aim is to ensure the method performs consistently across sites to maintain product quality, potency and comparability throughout the product lifecycle. This emphasizes the development of robust processes and a strong understanding of their critical attributes.

Key strategies for mitigating variability include:

  • Reproducibility and Robustness: Demonstrate the assay yields compatible results across laboratories
  • Documentation: Thorough records of the method, the assay performance and modifications
  • Risk Assessment: Identifying critical assay parameters and implementing controls and procedures to mitigate risk
  • Critical Attributes: Often identified through acceptance criteria but may include technique, reagents and details
  • Phase Appropriate Considerations: The rigor of assay transfer and validation typically escalates as a product moves from early-phase clinical development toward commercialization

The featured speakers will discuss key objectives and considerations of early-, mid- and late-phase assay transfers and will compare FDA and EMA guidance for assays transferred to and from CMC testing laboratories (ICH Q2(R2), USP <1224> and EU GMP Chapter 6). Case studies will highlight the challenges and present solutions to illustrate how proactive planning, detailed transfer plans and adherence to regulatory guidelines can ensure assay performance remains consistent across laboratories.

Register for this webinar to learn how bioassay method transfer strategies support reliable assay performance and minimize variability.

Speakers

Jessica Weaver, BioAgilytix

(Moderator) Jessica Weaver, MRes, Scientific Officer, CMC, BioAgilytix

Jessica Bridges Weaver brings over 18 years of expertise in pharmaceutical development of upstream and downstream processes and bioanalytical testing in support of Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC). Before joining the Scientific Office, she led a team of CMC scientists as an Associate Director at BioAgilytix. Prior to that, she worked as a Scientific Project Manager for Manufacturing Research and Development for academic and contract organizations. Mrs. Weaver completed her BS in Biological Engineering and a Master’s in Fermentation, both at North Carolina State University.

Message Presenter
Katie Harcher, BioAgilytix

Katie Harcher, MS, Bioanalytical Project Manager, BioAgilytix

Katie Harcher, MS, is a Bioanalytical Project Manager at BioAgilytix Labs, a contract research organization based in Durham, NC. In this role, she leads a team in the CMC department through all aspects of bioassay lifecycles, including development, validation and regulated sample testing. Previously, she was a Principal Scientist and Team Leader of Analytical Development at Athersys, Inc., where she designed, validated and managed novel characterization assays for cell therapy products in the Regenerative Medicine field. With a focus on cell-based potency assays, she has widespread experience in techniques such as ELISA, MSD, Flow Cytometry, cytotoxicity assays, proliferation assays and ddPCR. Katie received her BS in Biology from John Carroll University and her MS in Microbiology and Immunology from the University of Virginia.

Message Presenter
Julia Hecker, BioAgilytix

Julia Hecker, PhD, Principal Investigator, BioAgilytix

Bio Coming soon.

Message Presenter
Leigh Laundon, BioAgilytix

Leigh Laundon, PhD, Manager I, BioAgilytix

Leigh Laundon, PhD, Manager I, earned a BS degree in Biomedical Engineering at North Carolina State University and a PhD in Biomedical Engineering from Duke University. Dr. Laundon has seven years of industry experience in the CRO/CDMO landscape with a background in a variety of CMC assays. She also has extensive research experience with a range of cell lines for drug development. She currently manages teams in the development and validation of cell-based potency assays with an emphasis on ELISA and PCR platforms.

Message Presenter

Who Should Attend?

This webinar will appeal to professionals across the following roles and fields:

  • Pharma/biopharma professionals
  • Analytical Scientists
  • QC Scientists
  • Executives, Directors
  • Technical Leaders (CTOs, VPs and Directors)
  • Scientists in Analytical Development (AD)
  • Process Development
  • CMC Consultants
  • Quality Assurance
  • Regulatory Affairs

What You Will Learn

Attendees will be able to:

  • Identify sources of variability in bioassay method transfers and describe how laboratory conditions, instrumentation, reagents and personnel technique impact reproducibility and data integrity
  • Explain phase-appropriate strategies for method transfer and validation from early development through commercialization, aligning with regulatory expectations for assay robustness and consistency
  • Compare FDA and EMA regulatory requirements for bioassay method transfers, including key guidance such as ICH Q2(R2), USP <1224> and EU GMP Chapter 6
  • Apply risk-based approaches and documentation best practices to support successful method transfer, including identification of critical assay attributes and mitigation strategies for inter-lab variability

Xtalks Partner

BioAgilytix

BioAgilytix is the trusted partner for bioanalytical services throughout every phase of the drug development process. As a leading global bioanalytical laboratory, the company provides established and emerging pharmaceutical and biotechnology organizations with pharmacokinetic (PK), immunogenicity, biomarker, and CMC analytical testing services in a GxP environment. BioAgilytix maintains state-of-the-art laboratories in Durham, North Carolina; Boston, Massachusetts; San Diego, California; Melbourne and Brisbane, Australia; and Hamburg, Germany.

You Must Login To Register for this Free Webinar

Already have an account? LOGIN HERE. If you don’t have an account you need to create a free account.

Create Account